Russo Japanese War Essay -- Russian Defeat, Distance

Is distance an unconquerable problem, judging from the Russian Experience in this conflict and the British live on in the War of American Independence?In order to intelligibly understand the points presented, insurmountable must first be clearly push throughlined and understood in relation to the case. For this essay insurmountable means that Russia and the British were unable to overcome distance. Distance was the single factor that led to their unfitness to successfully wage war and defeat their opponents baring all a nonher(prenominal) difficult matters were achievable.In the Russo-Japanese War, distance from theater and within theater was not an insurmountable problem for the Russians. In contrast, distance from and within theater prove an insurmountable problem for the British during the War of American Independence. The Russians defeat was a combination of a unaffectionate value of the quarry (government & people), inadequate leadership (government & intensity lev els), and a poorly trained and equipped force that could not t unite their land and sea forces (government & forces). However, the British were bad handicapped by vast area of operations this impacted their placefulness to receive supplies, guidance, and reinforcements, as well as project its sea power effectively.By the late 1800s Russia had infiltrated the Far East, with two naval stations, embrasure Arthur and Vladivostok, forces based in Manchuria as well as the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railroad. Russia force desires in Asia were not of national security importance but that of imperialism and wealth, the antecedent was most important to Nicholas II and the latter of Witte. The Far East blowup would allow Russia to initially capitalize on Manchuria and Koreas resourc... ... the war (Fuller, pg. 406). The commerce capacity of Russia was also in shambles. Domestic trading and trading with Siberia was halted to have the sole use of Trans-Siberian railway for military transport (Warner and Warner, p.317). Revenue was imbibe and the hatred for Nicholas II had increased. Nicholas II was warned that an object so remote and out of touch with the national spirit would only fan the flames of revolution (Koda, p.397). The mutation was fully blown and the political and economic reform was being demanded. Boycotts and attacks on public officials were common. Nichols II content to lead a nation without the sideline of his people, led Russia into war with itself. Russia was losing face value with the world. Matters on the home campaign needed immediate attention and the war was a distraction that could no longer be afforded or tolerated.