Is India Safe for Its Residents? Essay

In fact I think INDIA is the synthetic rubberst place to live in on earth for Indians.Yes I do agree that there is terror of terrorism but thus u need to firmly fight againstit. U burn down spend off ur responsibilities by saying that India is not a safe place. Toh.. do u think that settling down in foreign can make u feel secure??? If u think so ur definitely wrong Are Indians safe in a expanse like AUSTRALIA,infact Indians are insultedthere and where ever we go and what ever we do..there is nix that equals our mother and mother land. violence and problems maybe a trouble for us ..but i think there get out be no placewith push through problems . what we need to do is justto manage ourselves any ways to sum it up..INDIA IS THE SUPERIOR,THE tyrannical AND THE HEAVEN FOR INDIANS. right???______________________________________In India there has been lack of political will and cocky decision making to bring such fugitives to justice. Barely a month later, with the Delhi blasts this weekend, the NSA might provoke to revise his earlier estimate his claimssound meaningless. Jammu and Kashmir is confront unrest. The Northeast is unsettled.West Bengal andTelangana are simmering, over 160 districts in 13 states are in the grip of left wing extremism. While the crime charge per unit is growing, abductions and extortions have almost become an industry. The rangdari and supari culture is now a revolutionary brandof threat to the Indian citizen.Money laundering, hawala, small arms proliferation and human trafficking are on the rise. The debate on countering these internal threats, however,has been overwhelmed by politics, rather than deterrent action.While India seems tobe safe are Indians secure? Or are we on course to a functional anarchy? Indias current crisis of internal security has been a concern particularly since December 2001.When terrorists assaulted Parliament, they struck at Indias establishment centre a qualitatively different target and at dep arture with Indias previous experience with multiple threats of insurgencies, terrorism, left wing extremism, soporiferous trafficking, religious fundamentalism and subnationalism. The Indian security apparatus and elite are more often than not indifferent, or have shied away from formulating an internal security doctrine. There has been no serious attempt to institutionalise a mechanism, direction or assertive policy to deal with internal threats interim, ad hoc and incremental convey have been the favoured methods adopted by successive governments. There is virtually no means to define coherentlythe enemy within. The continuous assault on Indian citizens and their foreland has shown clearly that the security apparatus has failed to plug the reocurrence of terrorist attacks.The intelligence fraternity gropes in the dark about the actual strength, source, capacity and logistics of the enemys following(a) attack.With our domestic security apparatus going so horribly awry we can organize it for granted that we will almost never ace the killers. Worse, these terror attacks and militancy are seen as merely a rectitude andorder concern and treated as subject of state, whenever, political violence on a massive scale breaks out in a state, the patrol become the first responders. The police in India are trained, equipped and mentally conditioned to deal only with civil disorders.When confronted with serious threats to internal securitylike terrorism, insurgence and other proxy war situations, they find it difficult to respond effectively. In such a situation, the state seeks the expertise of paramilitary forces.Creation of immobile track courts to avoid judicial delay and enactment of a deterrent anti-terror law would constitute an essential step forward. The need of the hour is toinstitutionalise, begin procedures and processesthat would boost inter institutional co-ordination, facilitate professional conduct of trading operations on athorough, professio nal policy analysis. Lack of professional mindset for informed debate, fierce expression of spite, bitterness and mutual political acrimony take place instead of constructive policy discussions