Case Study

Part A . Ella Williams fixed on the assembly name at Toyota repel Manufacturing plant in Kentucky . She developed suffering in her detention wrists , and arms and was diagnosed with impairments including wrist bone burrow syndrome . Ms . Williams was reassigned to ii quality manage inspection jobs , barely , when Toyota get Manufacturing added a third such quality control job , on that point was a dispute as to what happened next According to Ms . Williams her condition worsened and the fraternity refused a request by her for an accommodation , but harmonise to Toyota Motor Manufacturing the actor evidently began missing blend in on a regular stand Eventually , Ms . Williams acquire a letter from Toyota Motor Manufacturing that terminated her employment and cited an allegedly poor attendance degrade . Ms . William s d a charge of dis cleverness contrast with the EEOC . After receiving a counterbalance to sue letter Ms . Williams d suit against Toyota Motor Manufacturing for having violated the adenosine deaminase and establish her view that she had a disability , for purposes of the adenosine deaminase , on some(prenominal) assertions , including one that her impairments advantageously especial(a) her in the major accomplish action of playing manual tasksClaiming to be disabled from acting her automobile assembly line job by carpal bone tunnel syndrome and related impairments , responder sued supplicant , her former employer , for helplessness to provide her with a reasonable accommodation as needed by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (adenosine deaminase . The District Court granted supplicant summary judgment , holding that respondent s impairment did non define as a disability under the ADA because it had not substantially exceptional any major feel activi ty , and that there was no evidence that res! pondent had had a temperament of a substantially limiting impairment or that petitioner had regarded her as having such an impairment . The Sixth traffic solidification reversed , finding that the impairments substantially limited respondent in the major life activity of performing manual tasks .

In to demonstrate that she was so limited , said the motor social club , respondent had to show that her manual disability involved a relegate of manual activities affecting the ability to perform tasks at work . Respondent satisfied this test , according to the act , because her ailments prevented her from doing t he tasks associated with trusted types of manual jobs that require the gripping of tools and repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or in a higher place raise levels for extended periods of time . In reaching this shutting , the court found that evidence that respondent could tend to her individualized hygiene and carry out personal or kin chores did not affect a determination that her impairments substantially limited her ability to perform the range of manual tasks associated with assembly line jobPart B . The District Court found that Ella Williams did not prepare a disability , as defined by the ADA , at the time that the company allegedly refused to accommodate her , and temporary hookup the worker had a physical impairment , her asserting that she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks was irretrievably contradicted by her pressure sensation that she could perform some assembly and...If you sine qua non to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orde! rCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper